Quantcast
Channel: Plane and Pilot Magazine - Pilot Reports
Viewing all 277 articles
Browse latest View live

Mooney Ovation 3: Turbo Performance Without The Turbo

$
0
0

The Ovation 3 is the fastest normally aspirated production single ever—period

mooneySay what you will about American cars, but America builds some of the best civilian airplanes in the world. In the lower rungs of general aviation, especially trainers through four-seat retractables, American flying machines have virtually no equal.

Take, for instance, the Mooney M20R Ovation 3. The current M20R is a third-generation Mooney, the beneficiary of a half century of development. Designer Al Mooney inarguably got it right the first time out of the box back in the 1950s when he created his four-seat M20. While today’s airplane is light-years ahead of its ancestor in performance, comfort, systems, aerodynamics and electronics, you can still see the heritage of design—the arrogant, vertical tail; short, rubber doughnut gear; and tall baggage compartment.

Though it may not be the airplane Luke Skywalker would fly, the basic four-seat Mooney has aged at least as well as Christie Brinkley (who, more than coincidentally, is the same age) while nearly doubling climb rate and adding almost 100 knots to cruise speed.

In fact, Mooneys have consistently enjoyed speed disproportionate to their horsepower. The type has been among the world’s fastest and most efficient personal airplanes since its inception. Today, the Mooney Acclaim S is the acknowledged leader in the turbocharged class, notching near-turboprop speeds on a measly 280 hp.

Similarly, the Ovation 3 is the quickest normally aspirated single—quite simply (or not so simply) the fastest production airplane above the planet without a blower under the bonnet. The Ovation 3 features essentially the same 310 hp Continental engine used on the Cessna Corvalis 350 and the Cirrus SR22-G3. (The only significant differences are associated with repositioning some items to accommodate the Mooney’s retractable nosewheel.) Read More...

Cessna 400 Corvalis TT

$
0
0

Cessna initiates changes to its recently acquired Columbia line of low-wing singles

cessnaBack in the ’80s, when I was working on the ABC TV show Wide World of Flying, I flew up to Washington State to interview Ken Wheeler, designer of the Wheeler Express homebuilt, and fly his innovative airplane. In those days (1987?), the Wheeler Express was that rare machine: a four-seat homebuilt.

Like so many other homebuilt designs of the time, it was also a fixed-gear composite airplane, nevertheless possessed of near-retractable performance. Wheeler’s explanation of why he elected to design his airplane with fixed rather than retractable gear was interesting. “This is a homebuilt airplane, after all,” said Wheeler, “so ease of construction is important. Fixed gear is simpler, lighter and, in many ways, stronger. Whether you’re designing a homebuilt or certified airplane, retracting the wheels is almost universally more trouble than it’s worth. For most airplanes, this one included, it just makes more sense to leave the wheels hanging than to retract them.”

Lance Neibauer apparently felt the same way when he configured his first certified airplane, the Columbia 300. Though Neibauer had previously designed a number of fast, retractable homebuilts (including the world-beater Lancair IV and IV-P), he recognized that fixed gear was simpler to build, lighter, less maintenance-prone and, perhaps most important in this context, less expensive to certify.

The original Columbia 300 evolved to become the all-electric Columbia 350; later, Columbia added a turbocharged model—the 400. Today, the airplanes have been rebadged: the 350 as the Cessna Corvalis, and the top-of-the-line 400 as the Cessna Corvalis TT. Since Cessna acquired the model line nearly two years ago—its first low-wing piston singles ever—the company has made few changes to the basic design, but a few modifications were in order for model year 2009.

Despite their obvious style and speed, the original model 350 and 400 were light on payload, so Cessna addressed the airplane’s weight problem head-on. For 2009, a new composite, single-bottle oxygen system is mounted in the tail, replacing the former wing-mounted, metal containers, and that recovers a 25-pound payload increase.

Buyers also now have the option of deleting the formerly standard air-conditioning system for a credit and another significant improvement in useful load—about 75 pounds. That’s a total payload increase of 100 pounds over the old airplane.


The Corvalis TT sports a slick composite finish, and its main gear are carefully faired and tucked beneath the wings. Gull-wing doors that fold up and out provide ingress into a generously sized, automotive-like cabin.
A new cold-weather kit improves engine-oil temperatures for pilots operating the aircraft in frigid climates. For those same folks, Cessna has completed certification on an inadvertent TKS anti-ice system on the Corvalis TT, and is hard at work on the Corvalis (though that system wasn’t certified at press time). Rosen sun visors now are standard equipment. Finally, every Cessna Corvalis and Corvalis TT comes with a comprehensive FITS-based (FAA/Industry Training Standards) ground syllabus and five hours of flight training to bring new owners up to speed on the airplane’s systems.

Of course, the big news is that the Corvalis TT offers cruise performance more appropriate to a retractable than to a fixed-gear airplane. I flew a ferry-time-only 2009 Corvalis TT from Tom’s Aircraft in Long Beach, Calif., with product specialist Jade Duckart. Tom’s Aircraft Sales Manager Rich Manor explains that the new airplanes filled a gap in Cessna’s product line and expanded the company’s horizons in a big way. “The Corvalis line represents a major departure for Cessna in several areas,” says Manor. “Not only is it a low-wing airplane, it’s also an all-composite design with gull-wing doors and a side stick. Read More...

The Big Blue World: Evektor Sportstar SL

$
0
0

The Evektor SportStar SL is friendly to fly, sturdy, beautiful and roomy—and what a view!

evektor
Photo By: Mitch Bowers
Below, the greening, lake-dotted checkerboard of central Florida stretches in every direction. It’s a beautiful day to be flying a beautiful bird. Color me happy!

But it’s the view overhead that has my attention right now. Cruising out from our afternoon takeoff from Sebring Airport, it feels like someone tossed us up into a big blue fishbowl. I ease the center-mounted stick left, and the Evektor SportStar responds like it read my mind. This is “dreamflight.”

evektor Throttling up the Rotax 912 ULS and easing back on the stick, the SportStar climbs creamy smooth, with pitch pressures light as whipped butter. The super-sensitive electric trim button on top of the stick makes adjusting pitch quick and easy.

Rolls left and right, slow flight, approach and departure stalls—oh yeah. The SportStar couldn’t be more solid—or more responsive. Stick and pedal feedback? Ditto. Controls are light yet not oversensitive. What more can you ask of a recreational airplane?

Every sky bird has its own personality, and Evektor’s SportStar SL is no wallflower. I’ll remember it most for the comfortable, light but balanced control feel, near-top-of-class performance (110-knot cruise, 45-knot clean stall) and clean, friendly curves.

But that open-sky fishbowl feel, courtesy of the clear, bulbous canopy, comes back to me now. You don’t get that sensation in even the most generously windowed high-wing aircraft. Not to knock high-wingers, but airplanes like this one deliver the same visceral context as skinny-dipping at a country pond: Yep, a little exposed, a little daring, but way cool. You become a part of the sky. Read More...

Something Like A Phenomenon

$
0
0

Flying Embraer’s first entry-level jet, the Phenom 100


Phenom 100: By Ron Mohrhoff


phenomThere’s a saying, “A plane usually flies like it looks.” I put that to the test on Embraer’s latest release, the Phenom 100. My first impressions of the Brazilian-made machine? It looks big, really big. It looks fast and sporty, with its sleek nose design and relatively short wings. It looks like a real-deal corporate jet, beyond a VLJ.

Walkaround
My review started with a detailed walk around the aircraft exterior. I started at the door. Ask any aircraft designer what one of the hardest parts to design is, and you’ll likely get the following answer: the door.

Embraer put a tremendous amount of effort into designing the Phenom’s door, making those lucky enough to board feel as if they’re getting into a Gulfstream, not a jet that costs a fraction of the price. A simple twist of the embedded door handle begins an impressive mechanical ballet as the massive airstair door, with perfect balance, lowers to the ground, providing access to the cabin.

phenomThe particular aircraft I evaluated was equipped with the optional premium passenger door, which includes stainless-steel supports that hold the door at the proper height, once deployed. The premium door also adds LED lighting to brighten up the airstair for those late-night entries. What’s more striking is how well balanced the door is when you need to close it. It literally takes just your index finger to push up on the handrail and lift the door to the closed position—very impressive engineering.

As I walked toward the nose of the aircraft, it was hard not to notice the height at which the aircraft sits. The ground clearance on the Phenom 100 is about the same as on the Hawker Beechcraft Premier 1A. On the left side of the nose is the baggage area. Due to the location of systems in the nose, Embraer was challenged to put much useful baggage space there. With a total baggage capacity of about seven cubic feet in the nose, you’re limited to a small handbag and/or chocks and engine covers in that space. The larger and more practical baggage space is in the aft fuselage, accessed beneath the left engine; it holds 53 cubic feet of space. There’s a forward cabin wardrobe and seven cubic feet in the aft cabin lavatory cabinet. Read More...

Maneuvering Room

$
0
0

Head over heels in the Sukhoi Su-29

Thick mist billows in its wake like vaporized oil from a smoke system as the Niagara River tumbles over its namesake escarpment in a breathtaking aqueous Lomcevak. I catch occasional glimpses of the famed falls’ plume as we mimic its thunderous mayhem a few miles and an ever-oscillating number of thousands of feet of altitude to the south. This must be what it’s like going over the falls in a barrel—if the barrel had a radial engine and a big prop and pulled a lot of positive and negative G’s. We’re rolling and tumbling in a 1994 Sukhoi Su-29, the two-place trainer from the celebrated line of Russian aerobatic aircraft. Rick Volker (rvairshows.com), who flies a one-place Su-26 and a Supermarine Spitfire Mk 1X on the air show circuit, is demonstrating some of the qualities that brand Sukhois—in his opinion and by world aerobatic gold medal count—“the number-one unlimited category aircraft.”

Since their competition debut in the 1986 World Aerobatic Championships, Sukhois have come to dominate international aerobatic competition. Though newer unlimited aerobatic aircraft have since appeared—e.g., the Extra 300LP, MX2, Edge 540 and CAP 232—Sukhois are still flown by the majority of world-class aerobats and win an outsized proportion of contests.

Volker puts the Su-29 through barrel and four-point rolls, snap rolls and split-Ss, loops and Immelmanns, hammerheads and inverted flight.

He’s taking it easy on me. These are sportsman- and intermediate-level maneuvers, inducing relatively light and brief G-loads. But Volker’s control is precise and authoritative, and the Sukhoi’s immediate response to quick control inputs borders on violent. In between the maneuvers, he’s yanking us around to get in position for a photo ship. My gyros are getting scrambled pretty good, and by the time Volker turns the plane over to me after half an hour of flying, I can barely manage a Dutch roll before I’m too queasy to continue. We head back to Niagara Falls International (KIAG). I’ll get another shot tomorrow.

The chance to fly a Sukhoi comes rarely. There aren’t many of them to begin with—about 40 Su-29s in the United States, and another 30 or so worldwide. Moreover, they’re licensed as experimental aircraft in the States; though impressively overbuilt, they were designed and produced without any regard for FAA standards. As experimentals, they can’t be flown for hire, so you won’t find any on the flight line at aerobatic schools, nor Sukhoi owners hawking flight time. (Demo flights for prospective buyers are permissible, and the direct costs of the flight can be charged.) Volker has graciously offered to take me up in the borrowed plane—with the owner’s permission, of course.

Volker, trim and intense, is an inspiration to any late bloomer. He earned his pilot’s license a dozen years ago at age 40, immersed himself in aerobatics and, two years later, bought this very Su-29, N229SU, upgrading from a Pitts S2B he had been flying in International Aerobatic Club competitions.
Read More...

Bonanza In The 6th Decade

$
0
0

Is there a pilot out there who doesn’t yearn for a Bonanza?

BonanzaWhen I was a college student about XX years ago, one of the coolest cars on the planet was the Jaguar XKE. I had a rich classmate whose parents bought him one of the first ones available, and Jack quickly became the envy of every guy on campus—and the target of every coed.

The XKE had a look and sound like few other sports cars of its time. Jack’s Jag was a swept and sexy coupe, mounted low and stretched long. Resplendent in British racing green (of course), it had a distinct, immediately identifiable, endearingly evil rumble as it growled around campus.

Today, I have my own XKE, this one is a yellow 1969 4.2 roadster, and aside from the fact that it spends more time in the shop than on the road, it’s everything Jack’s old coupe used to be.

Jaguars may no longer be the leaders of the supercar class, but they still possess an indefinable charisma that keeps them in demand. Performance is a simple matter of horsepower. Charisma is more challenging.

bonanza
The “G” in G36 was added to the aircraft’s name in honor of its sophisticated Garmin G1000/GFC 700 glass panel.

For many pilots, the Beech Bonanza has the same kind of attraction. Just as the Jaguar was an automotive paragon of performance in the ’60s, the Bonanza continues to retain a similar attraction among general aviation airplanes. Never mind that its climb and cruise speed have been equaled or eclipsed by a trio of airplanes—the Mooney Ovation, Cessna Corvalis and Cirrus SR22—the Bonanza continues to garner more than its share of attention, a symbol of success repeated some 17,000 times over 62 years (in all versions).

The beautiful-though-controversial Model 35 V-tails are long out of production, and even the more durable and stable Model 33 straight-tails have been discontinued for nearly 15 years. Still, the current six-seat G36 Bonanza soldiers on, defying the odds and selling consistently to a select group of pilots for whom there’s nothing else that compares. Taken collectively, the generic Bonanza—from the original 1947 “straight 35” V-tail to the current, glamorous G36—is the longest-running production airplane in the world.
Read More...

First-Class Glass: Sting S3

$
0
0

Amazing cockpit visibility, tough, nimble, fast: What’s not to like?

There’s a joyful aspect to flying any low-wing LSA that you just don’t get with a high-winger: the unrestricted panoramic view from the horizon upward. I’ve unabashedly gushed about it before, and going up with SportairUSA’s Bill Canino in the new Sting S3 gives me another chance, so here goes.

The prime factor in the S3’s visceral in-flight magic is the big, clear bubble canopy: Its horizontal and overhead view is spectacular. The one-piece canopy is like a big goldfish bowl over your head. The “rails” of the bubble are almost below your elbows. The clear top runs all the way behind your head, so you can look straight up or crane your neck left and right and see what’s above and behind. There’s also a generous rear window. In fact, but for the single painted stripe where the roll cage spans the canopy, you’d swear you’re looking through a jet-fighter canopy—and a roomy canopy (44 inches) at that.

And in front, the low panel top and slope-down cowl that wraps the Rotax 912 ULS engine gives you a forward view at cruise that enhances the sense of sitting almost on top of the airplane, a bit like a seat in the opera house balcony.

So here we are, Bill Canino, president of SportairUSA, and me, just before sunset over an expansive Florida landscape of dark green foliage, jewel-like lakes reflecting burnt orange, and the towns and cities waking up for the night, spread before us like Christmas ornaments on a vast carpet.

Canino demonstrates the inherent stability of the S3 by accelerating in a dive, then pulling us up and over, strong and sharp, into a gentle wingover to the right, then taking his hands off the controls as it slows, hangs, then slips...smoothly, exhilaratingly...down into a dive.


The Sting S3’s 100 hp Rotax 912 ULS can be monitored via the optional GreenLine engine monitoring system.
Hands On Or Off
“These falling-leaf turns demonstrate the inherent stability and aerodynamic qualities of the airplane,” Canino says. “Watch now, I’ll keep hands off.” As the bird slips down and rolls out into a dive and the ASI shows 100 knots, he gently pulls out, and we round out the bottom. He pulls back on the stick, rolling smoothly in the opposite direction, and back up the hill we go.

We recover and he turns the airplane over to me. Already completely comfy in the airplane a couple minutes after takeoff, impressed by how nominal takeoff and cruise were, I find the S3 solid and tight, like a new car fresh off the showroom. Control pressures are light and responsive. Feedback is constant and true: You always know where you are with the bird. Smooth or snappy turns are effortless without requiring muscular input.

Likewise, pitch is quick but not twitchy. Rudder is effective, but you don’t need much; the net effect is familiarity. It’s a friendly, responsive airplane that’s immediately enjoyable to fly.

Now it’s my turn to do falling leaves. Up and up into the deepening oranges, golds and slate-gray blues of the cloud-filtered sunset, rotating like a big, glorious ball around the unobstructed canopy. Fabulous! The S3 is velvety—precise when you need it to be, forgiving when you’re lazy or a mite clumsy.

Okay, enough blue-sky flying, let’s look closer at this latest evolution of successful light-sport aircraft.
Read More...

Rocky Mountain High: The Aviat Husky

$
0
0

With a new Garmin G600 panel, Aviat re-creates the Husky backcountry classic with modern comforts and capabilities


Husky A-1C in Southern California


Aviat 4:19 a.m. That’s what the clock read as I stared at it for the fifth time in an hour. I was trying to sleep and it just wasn’t working. The hours dragged by in my tiny motel room in Afton, Wyo., across the two-lane highway from the Aviat factory where they build Pitts and Husky aircraft. Outside my window, I saw little snowflakes floating off the roof every now and then, dislodged by early risers running to their freezing cars to get the engines warmed up. The rest of the country was well into the lush unfolding of spring, but Afton hadn’t received the memo yet and was still clenched in the fists of a relentless winter. Through gauze-thin curtains, I could see the brilliantly clear Wyoming night.

I was here to see the newest Husky A-1C, with its Garmin G600 glass panel, 200 hp engine and other fineries. I would fly the plane back home to California, across hundreds of miles of Rocky Mountains, through desolate Nevada deserts and into the hubbub of Southern California’s crowded airspace. It was to be a small adventure—one that I had eagerly agreed to when I found out I’d be doing it with an aviator friend, Robert Stewart, territory manager for USAERO, an authorized Husky distributor for the Southwestern United States.

We had been in Afton for a few days—guests of Stu Horn, president of Aviat Aircraft, who had given us open access to his 72,000-square-foot manufacturing facility and its cadre of skilled workers. It was a look deep inside the workings of this unique operation, and one I took full advantage of as I learned how these incredible aircraft are born.
Read More...

Hawker Beechcraft Premier 1A: Little Big Jet

$
0
0

With six-passenger cabin seating, 450-knot cruise and fighter-like climb performance, the Premier 1A is the largest airplane in the light jet class


Hawker Beechcraft Premier IA


HawkerThirty years ago, in what turned out to be a career mistake, I abandoned objective journalism and essentially sold out (for a pile of money, a big expense account and a twin-engine company airplane) to edit a group of corporate magazines for a major aircraft manufacturer. Nothing wrong with its products; nothing wrong with corporate magazines—just not the right decision for me.

Two years later, I corrected my mistake by forsaking caviar and filet in favor of hot dogs and beans. In other words, I returned to freelancing. I was once again free to do what I wanted: fly and write about it for this and other magazines.

One positive aspect of my brief investigation of subjective journalism was that I interviewed a number of very affluent owners of turbine aircraft. Almost without exception, they were all brilliant, driven individuals who had worked hard to achieve their financial station, were proud of their accomplishments and could make convincing arguments that a corporate aircraft was the only way to get the job done.

The Premier was introduced in 2001 as a competitor for Cessna’s very successful Citation CJ series (at the time, the CJ1 and CJ2 models; since then, joined by the CJ3). From the beginning, Beech’s concept was to create the most comfortable single-pilot-certified airplane in its class.

In this respect, Beech relied in part on research from the Starship project of the 1980s. Though the Starship wasn’t successful, it did allow Beech to explore new avenues of composite construction and to certify an airplane unlike anything built before. Composite technology has been used extensively in military and commercial airline aircraft for the last two decades. The Hawker Beechcraft Premier 1A incorporates many of the technologies from that project.

Beech elected to construct the fuselage out of carbon-fiber/epoxy honeycomb composites (again, direct fallout of technology gleaned from the Starship). That’s at least partially because composites are 20% lighter and three times stronger than aluminum. Because of their light weight and economical construction, the fuselage structure benefits from 13% more volume. Though the wing itself is conventional aluminum, the ailerons, flaps and horizontal stabilizer also are composite (also for additional strength). Read More...

Gobosh 800XP: Flying With Composites

$
0
0

It has been five years since the FAA approved the first LSA. Here’s one of the latest and most innovative entries in the class.

HawkerI wasn’t quite sure what to expect. Gobosh’s Dave Graham had promised me that this was an LSA with a difference. I had my doubts, not because of any inherent mistrust of LSA, but because, well, all of the type are limited to the same parameters.

I had flown the Gobosh 700 a year or so before, and the new 800XP was touted as a different type of machine. Gobosh has always claimed it builds luxury-sport aircraft, not light-sport aircraft. Indeed, the company’s name alludes to “Go big or stay home,” a suggestion that the Gobosh 700S and 800XP are a cut above the competition.

These days, that might be tough to verify. The industry has gradually expanded to include 80 manufacturers, all hoping to cash in on the LSA boom that started nearly five years ago when the FAA approved the first few LSA.

Gobosh introduced the 700S in 2007, and the company has now premiered a new model. Both the 700S and the 800XP use the same Rotax 912 engine with 100 hp out front driving a fixed-pitch, three-blade, composite Elprop. The new 912 engine is a relatively high-compression (10.5:1), four-stroke mill that turns 5,800 rpm at redline and uses a 2.43:1 gear to reduce prop rpm to a more civilized 2,400. Max cruise is 5,100 engine rpm for 2,100 revs at the prop. TBO is 1,500 hours.

Aesthetically, the two airplanes look similar, though the 700 features a mackerel scoop beneath the cowling, while the 800 utilizes a smaller scoop with characteristic LoPresti-style cooling vents on either side of the prop. The 800 also has a considerably longer wing.

The 700 is made of all-aluminum construction, but the newer 800 is a composite airplane—not just composites covering an aluminum fuselage and wing, but a totally composite design. In fact, since the engine and prop are essentially the same on both airplanes, you have to conclude that composites alone reduce empty weight from 818 pounds on the 700S to 760 pounds on the 800XP.

That’s all the more surprising considering that the 700S uses four feet less wing. You’d expect that to result in a lighter empty weight, but composites are so disproportionately lighter that they easily offset the longer wing. Read More...

170-Knot SUV

$
0
0

It’s the top of Cessna’s piston line, and not unlike ground-bound SUVs, the Turbo Stationair can haul (almost) anything you can close the doors on


As one of the premier general aviation manufacturers, Cessna has always enjoyed something of a utility image. The conventional-gear 180 and 185 are near-legendary in the bush world, able to land and leap back out of places other airplanes would fear to roll a tread.

In nosewheel ranks, the 182 Skylane has a similar reputation as a hauler. Back in the days when airplanes were younger and lighter (just like people), the 182 could carry a full quartet in its four seats. Finally, the 206 Stationair could lift a hockey team, complete with sticks, helmets and protectors. (In fact, the early 206s had the distinction of being the only general aviation airplanes capable of carrying useful loads greater than their own empty weight.)

All four models were highly regarded as bush birds, though the taildragging 180/185 had an obvious advantage in off-airport operations. They didn’t have the STOL performance of a Maule or Helio, but Cessnas were nevertheless highly prized among airplanes that worked for a living.

The Skyhawk and 150 were dedicated more to training, and the Cardinal RG and Centurion to cruising, but most other Cessna singles gained fame as hauling machines, capable of lifting big loads with big wings and plenty of power.

Inevitably, as empty weight increased and gross weight and fuel capacity remained static, useful load shrank. A typical Skylane, despite its still-considerable talents as an everyman’s family airplane, is now a four-place, three-passenger machine with tanks topped. These days, according to Cessna, a fully fueled Skylane sports a 604-pound payload.

If you need four-place capability and then some, the better bet may be the Stationair. With a standard-equipped 850 pounds of full-fuel payload, the biggest piston Cessna offers heavy lift status for those with a need for its special ability to fly with a load.

Indeed, it was no big surprise in 1994, when Congress passed the General Aviation Revitalization Act imposing an 18-year statute of repose, that Cessna announced it would resume production of the Skyhawk, Skylane and Stationair. Though everyone assumed Cessna would resume production of the 172 and 182, the 206 was an even more logical candidate, especially overseas where its heavy-hauling utility talents are more important.

British attorney Chris Cope of the Isle of Man was looking for a specific set of talents. He needed six seats and a big payload, but not necessarily full six-place capability. He also wanted good stability for instrument flying in the cloudy skies of the U.K., TKS to help combat inadvertent icing encounters and a high service ceiling to help him top the weather. Cope looked at all the options, essentially the Beech 36 Bonanza, Piper Saratoga HP and Cessna Stationair. Read More...

New Light Twin From Italy

$
0
0

Tecnam introduces a twin-Rotax-powered four-seater in the tradition of the Partenavia P68C

tecnamNaples, Italy, April 18, 1986: Today, I’m first in line for takeoff from Naples toward our initial destination of Nice, France. It has taken all morning to assure that the paperwork is up to Italian standards, but we’re finally ready, or so I hope. For this trip, I’m leader dog of a small band of not-so-intrepid aviators who are, allegedly, experienced in ferrying little airplanes across big oceans.

It’s our fourth day in Naples, waiting for a customs strike to be resolved.
(I finally resolved it with $1,200—2.4 million lira at that time—paid to a friendly Italian customs agent at his home to compensate him for “overtime fees.”) There are three more new Partenavia P68s in line behind me, the last of 15 we’ve contracted to deliver from Italy to points west, primarily Florida and California.

Naturally, since I live in the Golden State, this and my other three Partenavia deliveries have all been to the company’s U.S. distributor, Mira Slovak, on the West Coast. Slovak, a Continental Airlines 747 captain in his day job, is based at Santa Paula Airport, 30 miles from Santa Barbara. That means the total trip is about 6,000 nm from Italy to Southern California.

The P68 is a reasonably talented six-place twin, possessed of surprising STOL characteristics, a comfortable cabin and easy handling, but it has fixed gear and a pair of 200 hp Lycoming engines, worth perhaps 150 knots’ cruise on a good day. Headed west, into the wind, even in summer, there are few good days.

This is my fourth and last delivery flight in a Partenavia, and I finally receive clearance to go. I climb out over the beach, leaving Naples, and watch the Italian coast fade into the haze. I set course across the Mediterranean for Corsica and listen on the tower frequency to make certain my three playmates are off and running.

It’s only 350 nm to Nice, and if we’re lucky, we’ll arrive early enough to make a run to Monte Carlo. Nice is the closest airport to one of the world’s smallest sovereign countries and, of course, the location of Monte Carlo’s famous casinos. Tomorrow, we’re off to start the trek to Iceland, Greenland and North America.
Read More...

Breezer II: The Girl Next Door

$
0
0

Familiar and lovely, easy to be with and great to fly

breezerFlying an unfamiliar LSA is a bit like a first date. Your friends have talked her up. She has a pretty smile, but will you get along? Does she Tweet or use Facebook, keep an old-fashioned diary, or both? Most important: Will she have a thing against flight review pilots?

I approach these aerial engagements by respecting the plane and listening more/talking less. After all, I have to report back later, and I want to give a sharp—and fair—impression.

So said, here we go with the Breezer II, an updated version of the lovely aluminum airplane from Germany that first won ASTM certification in 2005.

For this flight, it was a bit like dating the girl next door. I had first met the Breezer on a sunny spring morning at Mike Z Sport Aviation in Plant City, Fla.

Mike Zidziunas has been around the light-sport biz for a long time, as a flight instructor and as an A&P. His operation (www.mikezsportaviation.com) is somewhat unique in that it’s an LSA-only flight school and maintenance center. He’s also linked into Josh Foss’s Sportsplanes.com, a nationwide network of regional LSA centers that provide sales, flight training, warranty and maintenance service, and parts.

That day in 2008, we wheeled out the Breezer II and jumped up for the air-to-air photos you see here. During the shoot, I was quickly infatuated with her good looks, the clean yet comfortable lines and how well Mike Z flew it in formation.

breezerThe Breezer II (www.breezeraircraft.com) is an upgrade: Fuel capacity is increased, a firewall-forward baggage area carries an additional 40 pounds or so, and a steerable nosewheel ably assists the beefy arc of the fiberglass main gear.

Getting To Know You...
She’s a pretty airplane: solid and cute, with a no-nonsense profile and a big sliding canopy. Breezer is the kind of girl you want to treat right and take home to meet Mom.

When you step aboard (from a fuselage-mounted bar in front of the wing), the metallurgical echoes from your shoes bring a smile. Here’s a metal bird reminiscent of the Wichita tin classics of yore, in sport clothes. Suh-weet.

In the seat, you feel immediately comfortable and welcome. The leather upholstery is well made, tastefully colored and—most important—well-padded. No squirming around on this date. The nonadjustable seat back is slightly vertical for my tastes; not as bolt upright as a Piper Cub, but a little lumbar cushion would help. Read More...

Cessna 162 Skycatcher: It’s Here!

$
0
0

Cessna's successor to the 152, the Skycatcher, is poised to shine in the trainer market

breezerThe proliferation of LSA since the FAA announced the first approval at Sun ’n Fun 2005 has been little short of amazing. LSA Editor at Large Jim Lawrence suggests that there now are more than 100 different LSA models.

You can’t help but recall the similar rush to create the GA market following World War II. In those days, practically everyone with a slide rule and a drawing board was designing little airplanes for the plethora of military pilots returning from Europe and the Pacific. It was a boom that turned bust in record time, leaving the dregs of several dozen aircraft companies in its wake.

With Cessna’s heritage as the most popular manufacturer of GA trainers, the Wichita company was virtually guaranteed to enter this new market. The Model 162 Skycatcher was announced by Cessna President Jack Pelton in 2006, and by the time you read this, the first production airplane will have been delivered.

Cessna hopes the Skycatcher will help solve a major problem at Cessna since the demise of the 152. Like Piper and the old Beech Aircraft, Cessna always has fostered a basic trainer in hopes of strengthening the step-up market. The premise is that pilots who train in a particular brand are more likely to buy from the same manufacturer. Trouble is, the pilot population in general and student starts in particular have both declined dramatically in the last 30 years. In 1980, there were 820,000 licensed pilots. By 2007, that number had shrunk to well below 600,000. Though there was a slight improvement in the pilot population last year, Cessna knew it needed to facilitate the recovery by offering a new trainer of its own.

Despite the Skyhawk’s remarkable simplicity and durability, it always has been too much airplane for the job, both in operating cost and purchase price. I recently reported on a new 2009 Skyhawk with a base price of $297,000. I know of a flight school in Long Beach, Calif., that rents a 2008 Skyhawk SP for $159 hourly. For flight schools struggling to survive in a tough economy, the hourly rate is the primary key to profit, and even if a new Skyhawk is a leaseback, the rental rate may be prohibitive for all but the most affluent students.

breezerThe Skycatcher was intended to confront that problem head-on. Accordingly, the base price has been set at $112,250, and Cessna calculates a typically equipped plane will go out the door at $130,364. At only 40% of the Skyhawk’s cost and half the operating expense, it’s hard to imagine a new Skycatcher renting for as much as a 172.

Cessna loaned the first production-conforming airplane to San Diego’s King Schools, which is developing the Cessna Pilot Center private pilot training curriculum. From there, Cessna ferried the 162 to AOPA’s Aviation Summit in Tampa, Fla., and that’s where I flew the first machine with Cessna Chief Pilot Kirby Ortega. Read More...

The Single-Engine Jet From Diamond

$
0
0

I want one. And if you’re thinking about stepping up to your first jet in the next few years, you will, too, once you fly it. The Diamond D-Jet, which Diamond Aircraft is developing as its flagship product, represents what’s likely to be the first Part 23, FAA-certified, single-engine, turbofan-powered jet in aviation history—the first to market in a segment coveted by many companies.

Why do I want one? Four reasons: It’s fast, efficient, easy to fly, and has great ramp presence. It’s the perfect first jet to get an aspiring jet owner/pilot up and cruising in the flight levels at speeds above 350 mph.

On the day of my test flight, I was to fly serial number 003, the most recently built of Diamond’s three test planes. S/N 003 conforms aerodynamically to the production version, and thus, has almost identical performance to the future production aircraft. It’s your typical experimental flight-test airplane, with the interior replaced by flight-test equipment and instrumentation. Additionally, due to the test nature of the D-Jet, Transport Canada (the Canadian equivalent of the FAA) requires that all flight crew wear a parachute and the full suite of survival gear.

I’ve had my eye on the D-Jet since Diamond announced the program three years ago, and I wasn’t going to pass up an opportunity to fly it. So when Diamond President Peter Maurer asked, “Do you mind wearing a flight suit, helmet, oxygen mask and parachute?” I responded, “Sign me up!” without hesitation.

I suited up for the flight and then met with Diamond’s experimental test pilot, Mark Elwess, who briefed me on the test area and general operating procedures for the test plane. After our preflight briefing, we walked out to the plane, did our preflight inspection and strapped into the D-Jet. Though it’s not outfitted with a production interior, the cockpit was quite comfortable, with more than adequate forward and side visibility while sitting on the ground. After we completed our before-engine-start checklist, Elwess instructed me to turn the engine switch from “Off” to “Start”—pretty simple. At ground idle, the Williams International FJ33-5A engine was burning 84 pounds per hour, or about 12 gph at 24.7% N1. After we got the engine started, we taxied out to runway 15 at London, Ontario’s airport. The weather for our flight was perfect: light winds out of the south, scattered cumulus clouds and a ground temp of 20 degrees C.


Cyrus Sigari (left) and Diamond’s Mark Elwess (right) prepare to fly Diamond D-Jet S/N 003. Because the aircraft is still in the testing stage, Transport Canada requires all flight crew to wear a parachute and full suite of survival gear.
As I pulled up to the runway, I was instructed by Elwess to push the takeoff configuration button prior to calling the control tower. This button is pushed just prior to takeoff to ensure that the aircraft is properly configured (flap and trim positioning) prior to departure. If the aircraft isn’t configured properly, a CAS message is displayed on the MFD. If you forget to push the button before throttle up, then the system automatically will complete the checks and post the CAS message.

After I got my takeoff clearance, we lined up, and I smoothly advanced the single thrust lever to takeoff thrust, then quickly began accelerating down the runway. I began my rotation at 83 knots and broke ground about 2,500 feet down the runway. Shortly after liftoff, I trimmed out for an initial climb of 165 KIAS, climbing at 1,700 fpm and burning 850 pounds of fuel per hour.

The D-Jet’s climb performance was impressive. Climbing through 16,000 feet, we were at 175 KIAS (235 KTAS) with a 1,300 fpm climb rate, and we were burning 588 pounds per hour at ISA+10 degrees C.

Due to airspace restrictions, we were limited to 20,000 feet, which is short of the D-Jet’s 25,000-foot service ceiling. At 20,000 feet, I allowed the D-Jet to accelerate to a max forward speed of 307 KTAS, burning 523 pounds of fuel per hour, or 78 gph. With a day that was 10 degrees warmer than standard temperature, and 5,000 feet below the D-Jet’s “sweet spot,” the aircraft was already outperforming initial performance targets. Read More...

Bear 360: Living The Warbird Dream!

$
0
0

A sexy new airplane reminiscent of the WWII Bearcat

Designed for aspiring warbird pilots who lack the funds for a P-51 Mustang, the Bear 360 has a price tag roughly equivalent to that of a new Cessna 172. Unlike that airplane, however, the Bear probably will attract a crowd wherever it lands.

“When it comes down to it, looks are a lot of what warbird ownership is about,” says Bear Aircraft CEO Skip Holm. Oozing WWII-era Grumman “Cat” styling, the Bear 360 certainly has “the look”: round engine, distinctive fuselage style and short, thin wings. The all-metal, flush-riveted construction offers a warbird’s solid look and feel. And all the metal parts are fully anodized, inside and out, to eliminate any corrosion issues.

Rounding out the Bearcat look is its radial engine: a 360 hp, fuel-injected, nine-cylinder Vedeneyev M14P. On startup, the aircraft billows out smoke from the exhaust, rumbles down the taxiway and thunders into the sky with a commanding presence. Motorstar NA of Romania produces the standard 360 hp engine, as well as the higher-powered, optional 420 hp M14PF and 450 hp M14R; there’s also an option to install an engine from Barrett Precision Engines. Putting the optional oversized race spinner over the three-bladed prop provides the cowl section with a sleek, polished appearance.


Powered by a 360 hp Vedeneyev M14P (though you can opt for 420 hp or 450 hp versions), the all-metal Bear 360 embodies a warbird’s look and feel.
The one visual aspect of the Bear 360 deviating from its pure WWII styling, the large bubble canopy, fulfills its mission as a comfortable two-seater with ample room for pilot and copilot. Both cockpits in the tandem seating configuration have full flight controls. The front panel features a full instrument panel for the pilot, and the rear panel is equipped for limited passenger operation. The optional Fw 190 fighter canopy provides an even more dominating presence for the Bear 360. (An illustrated artist’s rendition of the single-seat racer version has the pilot cockpit relocated to the back.)

The well-appointed pilot panel includes Garmin’s GNS 430W and GTX 327 transponder and Dynon’s EFIS-D100 and AP74 autopilot, the latter of which assists on long cross-country legs. Electronics International’s MVP-50 engine monitor tracks what’s going on under the cowl. Electric trim for aileron and elevator is located on both sticks, and the front cockpit has rudder trim as well.

How does a plane like this come into being? Let’s start with aviation legend and retired U.S. Air Force Lieutenant Colonel Skip Holm, who has worked as a test pilot and engineer at Lockheed Skunk Works. Holm is a member of the Society of Experimental Test Pilots, an inductee to the “Living Legend” society and a veteran movie and TV stunt pilot. Also a renowned air racer, Holm has flown Dago Red to win Gold in five Reno World Championship Air Races. He also has flown such famed race planes as Rare Bear, Stiletto and Tsunami. One of this assignment’s biggest thrills was flying with Holm, a smart, engaging pilot with a nonstop supply of stories. Read More...

Arion Lightning LS-1: Smokin’ Lightning

$
0
0

An all-American speedster that flies as fast as the law allows


Produced by the same team responsible for the Jabiru series of S-LSA, the composite Lightning LS-1 is an aesthetically pleasing aircraft that offers high-performance handling capabilities.
The first one I saw was gorgeous, even bare of paint accents. That Arion Lightning prototype looked undeniably smooth and, well, fast as lightning. Pilots are inspired by lovely flying machines, and on the factory ramp in Shelbyville, Tenn., was one of the most fetching examples of an LSA I had ever seen.

Arion Aircraft’s Lightning LS-1 (www.flylightning.net) isn’t new. Indeed, in three years, the company has sold 80 kits, and 40 already are flying. Now comes a ready-to-fly airplane, an all-American flying machine that’s able to hit the LSA max speed of 120 knots (138 mph). The Lightning’s smokin’ fast speed, however, is just one measurement of its appeal.

Wherever it goes, the Lightning gathers admiring glances. That’s no surprise, as it’s an amalgam of the former Esqual from Spain with touches of Van’s RVs, the Aerospool Dynamic, various Lancair models and the also-Spanish Toxo LSA—each as shapely as a fashion model.

The Dawn Of Arion
Arion Aircraft consists of the same team responsible for the successful Jabiru series of S-LSA. Those fully built aircraft are the product of an Australian kit and American assembly process that morphs a crate-full of kit parts into a ready-to-fly airplane. Jabiru’s success is notable in that, in just a couple years, it has arrived at a #8 position in the market. [Read "Jabiru 230: Heart Of Gold” from P&P Dec. 2008.]

Arion’s tale is sure to be passed on to grandchildren: One night, while sitting around a campfire at Brennand Field, Jabiru’s former base, near Oshkosh, Wis., the Jabiru brain trust—Pete Krotje, son Ben and Nick Otterback—discussed a new airplane concept with several friends and supporters. The trail was a winding one, but in time, it led to the low-wing Lightning.

“We’re not an engineering team, but we have a lot of practical experience, and we applied that over time to create the Lightning,” reported Krotje. The team did, however, hire outside engineering services to technically validate its concepts.

The results speak for themselves: The aircraft performs enthusiastically, requires only a light grip on the joystick and is priced agreeably. The campfire crew came through.

A Bolt Out Of The Blue
On my second visit to Arion’s Shelbyville facility, I logged another hour aloft at “lightning speeds.” Even on a lumpy, bumpy day, the Lightning slipped through the air and exhibited a grace you’d associate with a much more expensive airplane. Otterback’s expression as I contoured through maneuvers told me something—as someone who does a lot of demo flights, he had seen my look of pleasure before.

After a year of hunkered-down work by the Arion team, the LS-1 earned its S-LSA airworthiness a few breaths before it was time to pack for Sun ’n Fun 2009. Read More...

PiperSport: Piper’s Big Play

$
0
0

Race-car gorgeous. Great performance. Available now!




This January, Piper Aircraft CEO and President Kevin J. Gould stood before a crowd of pilots and media, smiled broadly and said, “In what may be the worst-kept secret in aviation, Piper Aircraft is entering what is undeniably one of the most exciting market segments in general aviation.” It’s heartening to hear a major aircraft company characterize the still-emerging LSA sector so positively. That Mr. Gould’s opening icebreaker was a repeat of what Piper media rep Mark Miller had secretly told me days earlier also was informative.

Was the hush-hush run-up to this moment, carried forth on a surging tide of waggling Netizen tongues, a masterful orchestration by Piper to ballyhoo media attention? Regardless, Piper did garner attention, in spades—and history was made, at 11 a.m. sharp, on the opening day of Sebring U.S. Sport Aviation Expo in Florida.

Full Circle: Cub To PiperSport
Whatever the calculation behind Sebring’s most buzz-worthy announcement, the laser-like beam shining through the mini-drama is this: Piper is in, in big, and in right.

By now, you may know that the LSA picked by Piper is the SportCruiser, a popular LSA (#2 in 2009 U.S. sales) built in the Czech Republic by Czech Sport Aircraft (CSA). Repainted, rebadged and slated for deliveries, PiperSport didn’t garner one naysay among the scores of Sebring attendees I spoke with.

The consensus: huge, bold and wonderful for LSA. Piper’s timing couldn’t have been better: Cessna had just announced further delays—six to 10 months—in delivering its 162 Skycatcher.

Contrary to abundant rumors, Piper didn’t (wisely, concurred many) acquire a financial stake in CSA, the company that won an ugly 2009 Czech Republic court fight over control of the SportCruiser design. CSA appeared to be financially and managerially exhausted after the battle: rumors flew about lagging—or dormant—production of airframes and parts.

Yet even with all that bad grapevine juju, CSA still managed to deliver 31 airplanes to the States, in a terrible economic climate! That should tell you the potential of PiperSport to succeed big. Read More...

Cougar Baron: Most Happy Baron

$
0
0

Rocket engineering offers the world’s most enthusiastic Baron

In the world of corporate turboprops, 300 knots is something of a holy grail. Three hundred knots begins to intrude on jet country. Not many jetprops will manage such speed: the MU2, Cheyenne 400, Commander 1000 and perhaps one or two others.

Adding an STC’d conversion to the mix might seem like cheating, analogous to matching a full-race Porsche 935 against a group of stock 911s. Still, Darwin Conrad of Rocket Engineering (www.rocketengineering.com) in Spokane, Wash., has introduced a turbine-powered 58P Baron, and it does indeed nudge into the 300-knot club.

Conrad calls his modified Baron “the Cougar,” and it’s basically a 58P converted straight across with a pair of 500 shp P&W PT6A-21 turbine engines with fully reversible, four-bladed Hartzell props. The PT6A family of turbines is indisputably the world’s most renowned, with more than 36,000 in service in 170 countries. Included in the bargain are a pair of 200-amp generators and two 24-volt batteries.

The Cougar is the fourth in Conrad’s chain of P&W PT6A conversions. The other three are the Malibu Jetprop (a Piper Malibu/Mirage), the Turbine Air (Beech B36TC) and the Royal Turbine (Beech Duke). The new airplane employs the same engines used on the other three conversions.


The Cougar Baron is a converted 58P that’s powered by a pair of 500 shp P&W PT6A-21 turbine engines, offering a total of 1,000 hp, and a four-bladed Hartzell propeller.
Beech built about 500 pressurized Barons between 1976 and 1986, each with a pair of Continental TSIO-520s under the cowls. The 58P was an enthusiastic little twin, capable of an honest 210 to 220 knots, depending on which model you purchased (engine power varied between 310 and 325 hp).

I caught up with Conrad at EAA AirVenture 2009, and arranged to fly the prototype Cougar out of nearby Appleton Airport. This was the one and only flight-test article, and Conrad was halfway through testing for the STC award from the FAA. Conrad hopes to have full approval later this year.

Any time you boost horsepower by more than 50% (in this case, from 310/325 to 500), you can expect some major performance improvements, and that’s exactly what happened to the P-Baron we all knew and loved. Under the Rocket Engineering banner, the plane has undergone a dramatic transformation in personality while retaining the Baron’s gentle handling and endearing disposition. Read More...

8GCBC Scout: Up In Flames

$
0
0

The Scout Aims for a Firefight


The Scout Water Bomber can carry 100 gallons of water and has an infrared enhanced-vision system, enabling pilots to see through smoke and deliver water where it’s needed. It can reach confined areas that larger firefighting aircraft can’t access.

I was standing beside the runway at Fox River Airport in Rochester, Wis., home airport to American Champion Aircraft (www.amerchampionaircraft.com), to see the company’s stalwart 8GCBC Scout do its Elvis impersonation—as in Elvis the famous firefighting S-64 Aircrane water bomber. A call on a handheld confirmed we were in position. From the north, Jerry Mehlhaff Sr., the company’s owner and president, came boring in on the centerline in N125WB, the prototype Scout “Water Bomber,” dropping to about 150 feet. Just past the threshold, he released 100 gallons of water from its belly. The 800 pounds of liquid hit the runway with a loud slap, soaking an area about the size of a football field.

Can 100 gallons make a splash in aerial firefighting, where blazes can cover tens of thousands of acres? One is tempted to tell the trusty Scout, “Don’t quit your day job; no shame in simply being one of the world’s premier bush planes.” Despite the existence of such big bombers as Elvis and Evergreen International’s 747-200 Supertanker, back on the ground, Jerry Sr. made a case for using light aircraft as first responders “so they can get the fire when it starts, when it’s five acres or 10, not 5,000 acres or to the point when you need a 747 to try to slow it down.”

Inside the company’s offices, on the back of a hangar and across from American Champion’s three production buildings, Jerry Sr. told me, “The intent is to have airplanes close to the fire, and have them fly in groups of five or six. If there’s no airport nearby, the state patrol can block off 3,000 feet of highway, bring a tanker truck in, fill the airplane in less than two minutes. Every airplane could make five or six drops an hour.”


The Scout Water Bomber was conceived by Steve Green, a design engineer and former race-car driver from Canton, Ohio, who had been developing a light firefighting aircraft when he came across a Scout. “I said, ‘This thing has great flight characteristics. This actually could be the platform,’” Green recounted. He contacted Jerry Sr., went to the factory, talked to the staff engineers, “and the next thing I knew, he built this aircraft, and it is exceptional.”

The Scout’s potential as a firefighter aside, the two-place, tandem taildragger already has earned its props in more than 35 years of service: It’s prized by private owners, commercial operators and public agencies alike as a rugged, land-anywhere, STOL workhorse. The basic aircraft has changed little during that time, but a variety of improvements, upgrades and options make today’s Scout far more user-friendly and capable than when it debuted in 1974. Its continued popularity is a testament to both the original design and the current management of this family-owned enterprise. Jerry Sr.’s former wife, Charlene, is the company’s vice president; their son, Jerry Jr., an aerospace engineer and FAA-certified DER (designated engineering representative), is the company’s head of engineering. And with five aircraft models in production in addition to the Scout, certification of the Water Bomber is just one item on the company’s to-do list. Read More...
Viewing all 277 articles
Browse latest View live